SUVCW-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [SUVCW] southern departments forming was Kennesaw Mountian Camp#3Chartered
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:30:02 EST

In a message dated 12/13/2007 2:30:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
writes:

The only restrictions imposed on camps concerning what Department they
belong to that I am aware of and Brother Orr seems to have reinforced that
is that camps within the State boundary of a Department MUST belong to that
Department if the majority of camps in that state determine to form a
Department. A camp outside the state would be free to join if they wished.


Brother Eric,

The last sentence is incorrect. That can only happen if the CinC assigns
the entire state/territory to a department. Just as I assigned Minnesota to
the Department of Wisconsin when the camp formed in the Twin Cities and Alabama
to the Department of Tennessee when that camp the lone camp (at that time)
requested to be part of the Dept. of Tennessee. I agreed with the request but
still had to issue a GO to make it so. Please see Chapter II, Article I of
the Regulations for the process and the necessary approvals.

Rich Orr



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

This thread:

• [SUVCW] southern departments forming was Kennesaw Mountian Camp #3Chartered by "Ernest Everett Blevins" <>
  • Re: [SUVCW] southern departments forming was Kennesaw Mountian Camp#3Chartered by "gdy2shosflthybst" <>
  • Re: [SUVCW] southern departments forming was Kennesaw Mountian Camp#3 Charte... by

  • Re: [SUVCW] southern departments forming was Kennesaw Mountian Camp#3Chartered by

    • Re: [SUVCW] southern departments forming was Kennesaw MountianCamp#3Chartered by "gdy2shosflthybst" <>