OLD-WORDS-L Archives
Archiver > OLD-WORDS > 2001-05 > 0991160112
From: "Roland Elliott" <>
Subject: Re: [O-W] "Stones that could be Britain's pyramids."
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:15:12 -0700
References: <003301c0e851$92489840$9c6443d4@v2t7n8>
Us un hillbillies have known for years that are slow minded Islanders form
across the Atlantic did not know Diddly squat about migrations!The
"Islanders" were here before Eric and all the rest,the Feudal system
destroyed the "Islands" past history.You guys get bogged down in Piltdown
stupidity and can't seem to think broadly.R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mikey" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7 55 AM
Subject: [O-W] "Stones that could be Britain's pyramids."
Hi all,
At present being quiet, so forwarding a history pc'e.
Regards,
Mikey.
Spectemur Agendo.
Stones that could be Britain's pyramids
Backwardness of ancient Britain is myth, says historian
Fiachra Gibbons, arts correspondent
Tuesday May 29, 2001
The Guardian
The history books tell us how the Romans brought civilisation to the
barbarians of Britain.
But yesterday an archaeologist turned that long-held belief upside down by
claiming that the ancient people of these islands were far more advanced
than any of the early Mediterranean cultures.
More daring still, Barry Cunliffe, professor of European archaeology at
Oxford, also disputes what he calls the "established pseudo-history" that
the Celts swept westwards through Europe until they reached the Atlantic
seaboards of Spain, France, Britain and Ireland. "There is simply no
evidence for this," he said.
"There was no great movement of peoples towards the Atlantic, because they
were already there," he told the Hay-on-Wye book festival yesterday. "Only
recently have we begun to discover that these people were far more advanced
than those around the Mediterranean. We have underestimated dramatically the
complexity of these people."
Professor Cunliffe said the view of Stone Age Britain as backward had been
skewed by our historical reliance on Greek and Roman classical texts, which
were thick with prejudice and ignorant of almost anything beyond the Pillars
of Hercules (Gibraltar). "For all these years we have been looking at Europe
the wrong way round, and the idea that civilisation flowed out from the
Mediterranean out to the barbarian edges of Europe has clouded our view that
it flowed the other way too."
He said the Atlantic civilisations that began to develop on favoured
stretches of coasts such as southern Spain, Galicia, Brittany, Cornwall,
Ireland and the western |isles of Scotland during the Mesolithic period from
6000 BC were the "most advanced and stable communities in Europe".
He went on: "They were the first, for instance, to make what we call
'careful burials' and to leave offerings for the dead, surrounding their
heads with red ochre to symbolise blood. You find remarkable similarity in
these coastal burials from Iberia right up to Ireland and even to Denmark."
The huge shellfish middens on which Stone Age people lived, and later buried
their dead, also contained hooks and bones of large deep sea fish which
proved that they had seagoing vessels.
Prof Cunliffe said it was from these middens that the huge megalithic tombs,
standing stones and circles that still pockmark Britain and Ireland, sprang
up by 3000BC. "Thirty years ago it was held that these great stone monuments
were influenced from the Mediterranean cultures, but carbon dating has begun
to prove that this building was happening here long before they began to
appear in southern Europe."
The "astonishing complexity and daring" of these vast tombs, like those at
Newgrange in Co Meath, Ireland, and Maes Howe on Orkney is as impressive as
anything in Egypt at the same time.
The professor, who has developed his theories in his new book Facing The
Atlantic, and a forthcoming volume which follows Pytheas the Greek's
circumnavigation of Britain in 320BC, said it was "very mistaken" to dismiss
these Atlantic civilisations because they did not develop early forms of
writing.
"There is a tendency to say that the complex, urban societies that developed
in the eastern Mediterranean were more advanced because they had writing,"
he said. "But these Atlantic ones were innovative in other ways. They were
hugely more advanced in navigation, shipbuilding and their solar knowledge,
and that of the seasons and the stars."
But perhaps Prof Cunliffe's most extraordinary claim is that the Gaelic,
Welsh, Cornish, Galician and Breton languages are not the last vestiges of a
tongue carried by Celtic invaders from northern India, but were local
languages which grew from the aboriginal population.
==============================
Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com!
http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp
This thread:
| Re: [O-W] "Stones that could be Britain's pyramids." by "Roland Elliott" <> |