MCCRACKEN-L Archives

From:
Subject: RE: [MCCRACKEN] Thomas McCracken
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:57:12 -0500

There still may be a Thomas of 1754 in your ancestory. Depending upon the
family records and other records and how accurately people researched their
records.


I must wait until Friday to do research again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Darby [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:08 AM
To:
Subject: [MCCRACKEN] Thomas McCracken


I have thought for a long time that Thomas McCracken, b. 1754, was the son
of Arthur and Ruth McCracken who came to Charleston on the Chichester on 05
Jan 1868. I thought that Thomas McCracken, b. 1754, was the father of my
g-g-g-grandmother, Ruth McCracken who married Benjamin Darby.

Thomas (Dezern) please straighten me out. Do I have my ancestors all wrong?

Charles Darby

This thread:

• Thomas McCracken by "Charles Darby" <>
  • Re: [MCCRACKEN] Thomas McCracken by "Thomas Dezern" <>
    • Re: [MCCRACKEN] Thomas McCracken by "Charles Darby" <>

  • RE: [MCCRACKEN] Thomas McCracken by

  • Thomas McCracken by "Charles Darby" <>