GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-08 > 1122951736


From: "Jerry L. Ivey" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] CDYa/b
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:02:16 -0500


Oops, I just got back new results for another participant and we now
have a third parallel mutation involving DYS576. In all these cases the
mutations appear to be +/- 1 from what is believed to be the ancestral
haplotype.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry L. Ivey
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 9:48 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [DNA] CDYa/b

We have a parallel mutation in CDYa/b within the Ivey/Ivie/Ivys. We have
a second parallel mutation in 389-2 between two other family lines where
we know the specific ancestors of the participants.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Goff [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:30 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] CDYa/b

Thanks Bob. Yes, I know of these pitfalls. As such, I not interested in
asking sponsors to pay for a 37-marker test just to get CDYa/b, which
may not be useful for grouping anyhow. If I could test just CDYa/b, plus
a few other basic markers for alignment purposes, I'd go down that path.
At the moment, I much suspect there are parallel mutations or multiple
mutations, which are confusing the results. Thanks,

Phil

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Stafford" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] CDYa/b



This thread: