GEN-ROYAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-ROYAL > 2003-09 > 1064293713
From: Leo van de Pas <>
Subject: Re: Baronets Hotham {corrected copy}
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:08:33 +1000
References: <006a01c38169$51a801a0$6401a8c0@ed><000701c38172$268b3ce0$4e768d42@5gt4t01>
If you see The Complete Baronetage, you will find that Sir John Hotham, 1st
Baronet, was beheaded 2 January, the after his son Colonel John Hotham was
beheaded. They were two different people.
Leo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theron L.Smith" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Baronets Hotham {corrected copy}
> Following Reitwiesner's 2001 report, Camilla Shand has at least three
> descents from related Hotham ancestors.
> [Ed's account includes 1 amd 2 but not 3]
> DESCENT 1
> 2 John Hotham (#3916) d.1644/45 (beheaded)
> +Frances Wray 1611 - 1635
> [2 John shown as son of Sir John Hotham 1st Bart. d. 1644/45 and
> Katherine Rodes in Ed's source; see below]
> 3 Sir John Hotham (#1958) 2d Bart. 1631/32 - 1689
> +Elizabeth Beaumont 1632/33 - 1697
>
> 4 Elizabeth Hotham (#979) 1651/52 - 1684
> +William Gee (#978) 1648 - 1718
>
> 5 Bridget Gee (#489) 1671 - 1707
> + Sir Charles Hotham (#488), 4th Bart. d.1722/23
>
> 6 Sir Beaumont Hotham (#244), 7th Bart. 1452 - 1771
> + Frances Thompson
>
> From here 7 generations to 13 Camilla Rosemary Shand Parker-Bowles 1947
>
> From Reitwiesner, we have two additional Hotham descents to Camills:
> [Ed's most recent post shows DESCENT 1 and a slightly different version of
> Descent 22, but not 3.]
> DESCENT 2
> 2 John Hotham (#3904) (d. c. 1605), [TLS: prob. cousin of John (#3916)]
> +Jane Legard
> 3 Sir John Hotham (#1952), 1st Bart. beheaded 1644/5 (this appears to be
> the same person/different wife as Ed's 1 Sir John Hotham [good chance
these
> are not the same person]
> +Anne Rokeby
> 4. Charles Hotham (#976), Rector of Wigan Lancashire, d. in the West
> Indies
> +Elizabeth Thompson
> 5. Sir Charles Hotham, 4th Bart., d. 1722/3
> +Bridget Gee (#489) 1671 - 1707
>
> DESCENT 3
> 2 Frances Hotham (#3913), prob. sister of John (#3916)
> +John Gee (1603-1627)
> 3 William Gee (#1956) (1625-1678)
> +Rachel Parker
> 4. William Gee (#978)
> +Elizabeth Hotham (#979)
> 5 Bridget Gee (#489) 1671 - 1707
> + Sir Charles Hotham, 4th Bart., d. 1722/3
> (As in DESCENT 1)
>
> So since Charles Hotham (#976)'s wife, Bridget, has two Hotham descents,
we
> we can see that Camilla3 has at least three Hotham decents. Have there
been
> any recent updates in this area?
>
> Regards to all.
> Theron Smith
>
>
>
> ==== GEN-ROYAL Mailing List ====
> For information on subscribing and unsubscribing from GEN-ROYAL,
> see the GEN-ROYAL FAQ at <http://www.erols.com/wrei/faqs/royal.html>
>
This thread:
| Re: Baronets Hotham {corrected copy} by Leo van de Pas <> |