GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2001-02 > 0981045143


From: "Chris & Tom Tinney, Sr." <>
Subject: Re: Amie de Gaveston
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 08:32:23 -0800
References: <3a78fc42_1@binarykiller.newsfeeds.com>, <20010201035808.11586.00000170@ng-mk1.aol.com> <3A792E4A.C995CB2E@interfold.com>


And what about this D. Spencer Hines
"terminally hare-brained and risible" trash:

"Men, Women, Boys, Girls, Two Legs,
Four Legs ---- Piers may well have
had them all." Good for an X-rated site.
Excellent, brilliant evaluation: "may well
have had". The dead should be accurately
defined in factual evidence, for the benefit
of their own posterity. Maligning is not
kosher for the deceased, who have no rights
and cannot speak from the grave.
-----------------------------------------------
"Todd A. Farmerie" wrote:

> MWelch8442 wrote:
> >
> > No Mr. Hines I respect your thinking. But it's people who have
> > a title are not God!!!
>
> [snip]
>
> [snip]
>
> [snip]
>
> All that, and not a single word about Amie de Gaveston.
>
> I suspect an evaluation of the data and a discussion of the
> points of disagreement would be more helpful to the group.
>
> taf

This thread: