ENGLISH-FENS-L Archives

From: Kathryn Senior <>
Subject: Re: Cole lookup responses
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 09:32:55 +0000

>Dear Janice

I was concerned to see your mail that suggests you may have had some less
than kind replies. I haven't seen any in the list so assume they must have
been off-list.

Whatever they were I would urge you to pack away and forget them, not your
research hopes. I have been subscribing to this list for over a year now
and it is one of the most friendly. People are usually very willing to help
new and inexperienced researchers. I myself have some fiche on Hunts for
the 1841, 1851 and 1891 census as well as the 1881 discs and I would be
happy to pass on any Cole information.

I missed your original message asking for information - please repeat that
to me off-list and I will be happy to see if I can find anything.

With best wishes
Kathryn Senior
Reading, UK

Researching STRANGWARD, SCOTNEY, DEW, QUINCE, HORSFORD and others.


>______________________________X-Message: #13
>Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:53:46 +1100
>From: "C&J Cartwright" <>
>To:
>Message-ID: <003b01bf6dbf$9b3cd6e0$>
>Subject: Apologies re lookup Cole
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>My apologies to the list re look up for John Cole. Evidently I must provide
>more information before making such a request
>I am a beginner and this was my 1st request for a look-up so until more
>information can be provided I shall pack it up and put it away and forget
>about it.
>I thought by joining this list it would be of some help and benefit for me.
>Evidently I was wrong
>Janice
>Australia

This thread:

• Re: Cole lookup responses by Kathryn Senior <>