CASEY-L Archives
Archiver > CASEY > 2003-01 > 1042002398
From: "Gail Moore" <>
Subject: Re: [CASEY-L] Your request for info on Moses Casey - presuming he is a son of a Jesse Casey
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 00:06:22 -0800
References: <20030107.013245.-864065.2.mecasey1@juno.com>
Are you the list host for this list?
Gail
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mary E. Casey" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:32 AM
Subject: [CASEY-L] Your request for info on Moses Casey - presuming he is a
son of a Jesse Casey
> Tim, et al,
>
> I believe I am the primary researcher on the lineage of Moses CASEY.
> Moses was the son of Ambler CASEY not the son of any Jesse CASEY.
>
> I had to spend years in disproving everything that had been in print for
> a minimum of 50 years before I could find out the real lineage there.
>
> Please do not perpetuate inaccurate information of any Jesse CASEY having
> a son named Moses CASEY - unless you have definitive records to prove
> said lineage.
>
> If you do have records proving that lineage I would love to have a copy.
> I have researched for many years and have not been able to prove who
> Ambler CASEY's father was. (Of course I spent a lot of time disproving
> the inaccurate info first.) The way I disproved the information was in
> doing research. I could find NOTHING that matched the manuscript along
> the Ambler CASEY/Moses CASEY lineage. I'm talking abt the Ambler CASEY
> who was married to Polly ELLISON. The Moses CASEY I am referring to is
> the one who married Elizabeth COE, a sister of the wife of a Jesse E.
> CASEY, Martha "Patsy" COE.
>
> I believe there was a closeness between Ambler CASEY and the Jesse CASEY
> to which I referred. However, I have found absolutely no records to prove
> anything beyond Ambler CASEY. In fact a lot of that manuscripts info has
> been PROVEN to be inaccurate.
>
> Pls don't make things worse by publishing inaccurate info.
>
> So many people are very willing to take "as gospel" anything published
> anywhere versus verifying anything with real research; i.e., research of
> records. This is a HUGH mistake and can cause true researchers much time
> and effort.
>
> I believe you are going by the George and Abner CASEY "manuscript" that
> has been proven to have MANY inaccuracies. Please don't make things worse
> by perpetuating that proven inaccurate information.
>
> I believe whatever George and Abner CASEY's lineage may have been at
> least somewhat accurate. The mistake they made was in trying to make
> other CASEYs fit into places where they did not/and still don't fit.
>
> Would ANYONE of the Ambler CASEY or Moses CASEY lineage please disregard
> anything other than what I have written here unless you have proof via
> records. Otherwise you have the wrong lineage and may end up doing
> research on people no associated with your line(s) at all. If you have
> records I am VERY interested.
>
> Tim's request upsets me because Ambler and Polly (ELLISON) CASEY had a
> son named John CASEY as well as a son named Moses CASEY. I don't want
> people getting the John CASEYs mixed up. There has already been so much
> inaccurate information "printed".
>
> Tim, my apologies if you have proof of the lineage for which you are
> requesting information for publication on the web - or elsewhere.
>
> Mary E. Casey
>
>
> Ambler CASEY < Moses CASEY < Ambler CASEY < Austin Allen CASEY , William
> Grant CASEY < Raymond Perry CASEY < Mary Evelyn CASEY = proven lineage.
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
> Only $9.95 per month!
> Visit www.juno.com
>
>
> ==== CASEY Mailing List ====
> To unsubscribe send a message to with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the body and no other text.
>
>
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>
>
This thread: