APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2008-03 > 1204378218


From: bob gillis <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Birth / Death Question
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:30:18 -0500
References: <082801c87ad4$148f7320$3dae5960$@com><47C8767B.3030101@verizon.net><002501c87b38$35a3c750$0201a8c0@YOUR58BA15CF1B>
In-Reply-To: <002501c87b38$35a3c750$0201a8c0@YOUR58BA15CF1B>


Richard A. Pence wrote:

snip
>
> To Bob:
>
> Modern Genealogical Nomenclature 101 - what we presumably - or
> possibly (don't know what sort of document Cheryl has) - have here is
> not two "primary" records, but two "original" records containing
> primary information. <g>

I thought when I sent the message that someone would take umbrage with
that term in this case.

But what would be a primary record if as Cheryl later said her records were
pictures of the original town record books?

bob gillis

This thread: